Should You Use Papr?
Quick decision guide to help you choose the right memory approach.
For the full detailed comparison and implementation code, continue to Why Papr.
Decision Flow
Start here ↓
Do you need memory across sessions?
├─ No → Session state (no DB needed)
└─ Yes ↓
Will users query with different words than stored?
├─ No → SQLite + FTS5 (keyword only)
└─ Yes ↓
Do you need relationships between data?
├─ No → Vector DB (semantic only)
└─ Yes ↓
Do you want graph-aware retrieval only, or memory that gets better with usage?
├─ Graph-only is enough → DIY vector + graph stack
└─ Yes → Use Papr ✓What Each Choice Means
Session State Only
When: Single conversation, no persistence needed
Example: Chatbot that doesn't remember between sessions
Next: No memory layer needed
SQLite + FTS5
When: Multi-session, exact keyword matching sufficient
Limitation: No semantic search (misses "refund" when you stored "return")
Next: SQLite FTS5 docs
Vector DB
When: Need semantic search, no relationships
Limitation: Can't connect entities (Person → Project → Bug)
Next: Choose Pinecone, Weaviate, or similar
DIY Hybrid Stack
When: You only need vector + graph retrieval and can operate your own stack
Reality: 6+ systems to manage, 2-3 months build, 0.5-1 FTE ongoing
Next: Why Papr
Papr
When: Need semantic + relationships + consolidation
Reality: 15 min to prototype, 0 FTE maintenance
Key difference: Memory improves from usage (predictive), not frozen
Next: Quick Start
Why Relationships Matter
Vector-only example:
Query: "What's the status of the auth bug?"
Returns: Text fragments with "auth" and "bug"
Problem: Which bug? Who's working on it? Related PRs?With graph:
Query: "What's the status of the auth bug?"
Returns:
- Bug ticket with status
- Assignee and priority
- Related PRs and code
- Discussions and decisions
All connected, not just similar textWhy Predictive Memory Matters (Beyond Vector + Graph)
Vector + graph gives you:
- Better semantic matching
- Relationship traversal
- Richer retrieval than keyword-only
Predictive memory adds:
- Behavioral learning from usage patterns over time
- Anticipatory context preloading for lower latency (when cached)
- Ranking that improves as retrieval logs and interaction history grow
In short: vector + graph improves what you can retrieve now; predictive memory improves how retrieval quality evolves over time.
Which Papr API to Use
Once you've chosen Papr, pick your starting point:
By Input Type
- Chat/conversations →
/v1/messages(quickstart) - Documents (PDFs, Word) →
/v1/document(quickstart) - Postgres/SQL records →
/v1/memorymanual mode (quickstart) - Agent learnings →
/v1/memoryauto mode (quickstart)
By Goal
- Connect structured + unstructured → Structured Data Memory Quickstart
- Analytics/insights → GraphQL guide
- Custom graph structure → Memory policies
Next Steps
Ready to start:
- Quick Start - 15 min to working prototype
- Golden Paths - Four integration patterns
Need more details:
- Why Papr - Detailed comparison